/** * 六个活动槽位(docs/MVP示例工作流.html §1.1–1.7)—— **契约就绪、实现留白**。 * * 槽位 = 活动的契约面:身份 / 七件契约(入参、出口)/ 声明(域对象、工具名)/ 业务模型骨架。 * 与工具的解耦就在声明:`declarations.tools` 只写**名**,注册、连接值、白名单全在治理侧。 * A5 定价审批是**内置审批点**(审批不是任务,零开发、不入库),不在槽位之列。 * * 实现待底座完备后逐个开发:届时以新包版本经安装通道换入,槽位契约不动。 * * **占位期六个槽位一律 `flow` 范式**(2026-07-28):A2/A3/A6 本该是案例活动(loop), * 但 loop 由 Agent 每拍决策、要真调模型;占位本身就是固定序列,声明成 flow 才诚实。 * 真开发它们为案例活动时,以新包版本装回 `paradigm: 'loop'`,那时按 CMMN + DMN 重写业务模型 * —— 所以这里不留一份没人用的 loop 骨架占地方。 */ import { createHash } from 'node:crypto'; import { activityManifestSchema } from '@contracts'; import type { ActivityManifest } from '@contracts'; import type { Container } from './container.ts'; import { declarationsFor } from './seed-mvp-data.ts'; /** * 槽位占位入口 —— **不是实现**:装载它只会得到「未实现」的诚实报错。 * mock 只许在外界:这里绝不发既定载荷装作跑过(README 平移规则)。 */ export const SLOT_ARTIFACT = [ '// 活动槽位:契约已就绪,实现待底座完备后逐个开发。', "throw new Error('活动尚未实现 —— 这是槽位,契约见治理台活动库');", ].join('\n'); const checksum = createHash('sha256').update(SLOT_ARTIFACT).digest('hex'); /** 一步机器落地:调占位工具,把它的出参按映射落成台账的一行 */ type Landing = { /** 人读的步名 */ readonly label: string; readonly domain: string; readonly object: string; /** 主键列 → 取值路径(占位工具出参的键,或作用域里的键) */ readonly key: Readonly>; /** 业务列 → 取值路径 */ readonly fields: Readonly>; }; /** * 占位期的业务模型骨架 —— **机器步落地 + 一张验收单要人签**。 * * 为什么是这个形状: * * ① **必须写台账**。出口载荷只从落地事实推导(数组字段 ← 这一单的落地行, * 标量字段 ← 落地行铺平后的值)。不写台账就发不出口 → 下游网关没有判据 → * 一条边都选不中 → 流无声停在第一个活动(实测过,并有 route-dead-end 事件写明缺哪个键)。 * * ② **末步必须是验收工单**。`flow-runner` 写死了 `released = 末步是验收 && 裁决通过` —— * 末步不是验收,活动永远不 release:人把前面的单都答完,任务却停在 `awaiting-human`, * 没有待答工单也没有待答卡,**等人却没东西给人答**(实测)。 * * ③ **占位不替活动做判断**。落的值来自占位工具,它只穿透上游给的值、给显眼的默认, * 行上写 `status: '占位'`。打标、定价、比价那些是活动自己的内容,真实现时整段换掉。 * * ④ **验收单可以改写落地值**。人类步的回传值同样经 `writeOutput` 落台账(flow-runner 的 * resume 路径),步序在后、后写赢 —— 占位期要走哪个分支,在验收时说,不必改代码。 * * 一步只写**一行**(`writeOutput` 每步一次 draftWrite),所以要几行就给几个 landing。 */ const placeholderSkeleton = ( sop: readonly string[], landings: readonly Landing[], /** 台账列名 → 回传字段名 */ ask: Readonly>, ) => { const total = landings.length + 1; const failure = { retry: { times: 0, backoff: 'PT30S' }, fallback: { kind: 'blocked' as const } }; const source = { k: '来源', v: '活动槽位占位产出(不做业务判断;真实现时整段换掉)' }; const machine = landings.map((l, i) => ({ name: `S${i + 1}`, label: l.label, /* 入参映射:占位工具要的键从任务数据取 —— 上游给了就穿过去 */ input: { rfqRef: 'rfqRef', customerCode: 'customerCode', pn: 'pn', quotedAt: 'quotedAt', needAlternative: 'needAlternative', needSourcing: 'needSourcing', }, kind: 'pure-tool' as const, tool: 'slot.placeholder', output: { domain: l.domain, object: l.object, key: l.key, fields: l.fields }, failure, })); return { paradigm: 'flow' as const, steps: [ ...machine, { name: `S${total}`, label: '收口验收', input: {}, kind: 'human' as const, workOrder: 'acceptance' as const, card: { title: '收口验收', /* * 卡面要人填的正是**这个活动该产出、而占位产不出**的判断值(如两枚去向旗)。 * 填了就覆盖占位行的同一列 —— 于是下游网关判的是人的决定,不是占位的默认。 */ ...(Object.keys(ask).length === 0 ? {} : { fields: Object.values(ask) }), basis: [ { k: '步序', v: `第 ${total} 步 / 共 ${total} 步(收口)` }, { k: '作业指导书', v: sop.join(' · ') }, { k: '占位落地', v: landings.map((l) => `${l.domain}.${l.object}`).join('、') }, source, ], }, /* 验收也要把值落回同一行:人填的覆盖占位的 */ ...(landings[landings.length - 1] === undefined ? {} : { output: { domain: landings[landings.length - 1]!.domain, object: landings[landings.length - 1]!.object, key: landings[landings.length - 1]!.key, fields: ask, }, }), deadline: 'P1D', failure, }, ], parallelGroups: [], }; }; /** * 各活动占位期要落的台账行 —— 按各自契约出口的必填字段倒推。 * * 数组字段(records / rows / floors)由「这一单的全部落地行」整体构成,所以只要有行就有值; * 标量字段必须有**对应的列**才取得到 —— 这就是为什么 A1/A2 要落「受理结论」那一行。 * 一步一行,所以列在这里的条数就是机器步的步数。 */ const LANDINGS: Readonly> = { 'rfq-intake': [ { label: '落统一受理记录', domain: 'project', object: 'intake_record', key: { customer_code: 'customerCode', pn: 'pn' }, fields: { status: 'status' }, }, { // 两枚去向旗落这一行:一单一行,G1/G2 读同一个值(挂按料号分的行会 last-write-wins) label: '落受理结论(去向旗)', domain: 'project', object: 'intake_verdict', key: { rfq_ref: 'rfqRef' }, fields: { need_alternative: 'needAlternative', need_sourcing: 'needSourcing', status: 'status' }, }, ], 'alt-selection': [ { label: '落替代对标表', domain: 'project', object: 'alt_benchmark', key: { original_pn: 'pn', candidate_pn: 'pn' }, fields: { alt_grade: 'status' }, }, { // A2 回写**同一行**的 needSourcing —— 去向只有一个出处,不复制 label: '回写受理结论(是否还要寻源)', domain: 'project', object: 'intake_verdict', key: { rfq_ref: 'rfqRef' }, fields: { need_sourcing: 'needSourcing', status: 'status' }, }, ], 'sourcing-inquiry': [ { label: '落寻源比价表', domain: 'project', object: 'sourcing_compare', key: { pn: 'pn', supplier: 'supplier' }, fields: { quote_price: 'quotePrice', verdict: 'status' }, }, { label: '落供应商底价表', domain: 'project', object: 'supplier_floor', key: { pn: 'pn', supplier: 'supplier' }, fields: { floor_price: 'floorPrice' }, }, ], 'cost-pricing': [ { label: '落报价草案', domain: 'project', object: 'quote_draft', key: { pn: 'pn' }, fields: { proposed_price: 'proposedPrice' }, }, ], 'quote-negotiation': [ { label: '落正式报价单', domain: 'project', object: 'formal_quote', key: { pn: 'pn' }, fields: { unit_price_cny: 'unitPrice' }, }, ], 'intel-archive': [ { label: '落报价落地率统计', domain: 'project', object: 'landing_stats', key: { period: 'period' }, fields: { landing_rate: 'landingRate' }, }, ], }; /** * 验收单要人填的值 —— **这个活动该产出、而占位产不出的判断**。 * 填了就覆盖占位行的同一列,下游网关判的是人的决定。 * A6 的三个去向不在这儿:那是选择组(恰发一口),由放行时选口给出。 * * 形状是「**台账列名 → 回传字段名**」,两边不能混: * 列名必须是小写蛇形(台账的标识符闸是 `^[a-z][a-z0-9_]*$`), * 回传字段名是卡面表单的键、跟着活动契约的驼峰走。 * 我把这两个搞混过一次:`fields: { needSourcing: 'needSourcing' }` 直接把驼峰当列名, * draftWrite 抛「非法标识符:needSourcing」,而且是在放行之后抛 —— 任务卡在 running、 * 台账一行没有,推进器还在一秒一次地重试。 */ const ASK: Readonly>>> = { 'rfq-intake': { need_alternative: 'needAlternative', need_sourcing: 'needSourcing' }, 'alt-selection': { need_sourcing: 'needSourcing' }, 'sourcing-inquiry': {}, 'cost-pricing': {}, 'quote-negotiation': {}, 'intel-archive': {}, }; const identity = (activityId: string, name: string, paradigm: 'flow' | 'loop') => ({ activityId, name, /* * 包版本 —— 改了槽位携带的东西就必须往上走。 * * 「安装恒为新增、版本并存」是硬不变量:同 (activityId, version) 再装是 no-op, * 库里的 manifest 一个字都不会动。所以 0.1.0 期间把卡面从空卡改成自述卡, * 重播种会「静默成功」—— 打印「已装入」,库里还是旧的(实测踩到)。 * * 0.2.0:步骤卡面自述(标题 / 要你答 / 步序依据)。 * 0.3.0:人工调用预算按各槽位自己的步数给 —— 共用 3 会让 6 步的 A1 走到第 3 步就 * `exhausted` 终态、结构上永远走不完(实测)。授权面申报值同源。 * 0.4.0:flow 骨架末步追加**收口验收**—— 没有它活动永远不 release, * 六步答完就卡在「等人却没东西给人答」(实测)。 * 0.5.0:A1/A2 声明「受理结论」对象(两枚去向旗有处落地);A2 入参加 rfqRef。 * 0.6.0:占位期骨架改**机器步落台账 + 一张验收单**(用户定:只留验收要人签)。 * 六个槽位一律 flow 范式;预算固定 humanCalls: 2。 * 0.6.1:修验收步的出参映射 —— 键是**台账列名**(小写蛇形),不是回传字段名。 * 0.7.0:A6 的三个去向改**选择组**(契约 0.2.0)—— outcome 由放行选口给出,G4 才判得了。 * 契约的入参出口一直没动,故 `contract.version` 始终 0.1.0。 * 在途任务按启动时版本跑完,不受影响。 */ packageVersion: '0.7.0', category: '统一报价', paradigm, sdkVersion: '0.1.0-m5', checksum, }); const harness = { memoryWindow: 20, stallAfter: 'PT45M', nudge: [] }; /** 七件契约里逐槽位相同的空段 —— 槽位期没有必交付物/验收细则,实现期再补 */ const contractRest = { requiredDeliverables: [], acceptanceCriteria: [], prohibitions: [] }; /** * 各槽位的步/项清单 —— **预算与骨架共用同一个数组**,数不上不会漂移。 * flow 是声明式人类步(一步一张工单);loop 的项由 Agent 临场推进, * 最坏情况一项问一次人,所以也按项数给预算。 */ const STEPS = { rfqIntake: ['接收登记', '追问补全信息', '逐条解析归一', '查历史价', '逐条定状况标', '定去向与派单'], altSelection: ['替代对标表', '初筛清单'], sourcingInquiry: ['寻源比价表', '供应商回价单'], costPricing: ['取价基准', '逐条定价'], quoteNegotiation: ['正式报价单'], intelArchive: ['结果登记', '画像更新', '落地率统计'], } as const; /** * 预算 —— `humanCalls` 必须**够这个槽位实际要问人的次数**。 * * 曾经六个槽位共用 `humanCalls: 3`,而那时 A1 有 6 个人类步:走到第 3 步就 `exhausted` * 终态、工作流转 abnormal,活动**结构上永远走不完**(实测:used 3 / cap 3,停在 A1)。 * 现在占位期是**机器步 + 一张验收单**,只问人一次,所以固定给 2(1 张验收 + 1 次余量)。 * 这条约束本身不随形态变:实现期活动自己声明真实预算时,实际要问人的次数 ≤ humanCalls。 */ const budgetFor = () => ({ steps: 40, tokens: 200_000, activeMinutes: 60, humanCalls: 2, }); /** * 授权面申报的人工调用预算 —— 与运行时真正吃的那个数**同源**。 * 运行时只认 `resources.budget.humanCalls`(见 `wiring/engines.ts` 的 `caps`); * `authorization.humanCallBudget` 只给治理台显示。两者不一致,治理台就会摆一个假数。 */ const authorizationFor = () => ({ discretion: [], preauthorizedActions: [], humanCallBudget: budgetFor().humanCalls, }); export const MVP_SLOTS: readonly ActivityManifest[] = [ /* ── A1 客户RFQ受理(SOP · BD) ──────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('rfq-intake', '客户RFQ受理', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'rfq-intake', version: '0.1.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['customerCode', 'rfqRef'], properties: { customerCode: { type: 'string' }, rfqRef: { type: 'string' }, subject: { type: 'string' }, body: { type: 'string' }, quotedAt: { type: 'string' }, }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'intake', description: '统一受理记录(打标)+ 两枚去向旗', payload: { type: 'object', required: ['records', 'needAlternative', 'needSourcing'], properties: { records: { type: 'array' }, pn: { type: 'string' }, type_tag: { type: 'string' }, needAlternative: { type: 'boolean' }, needSourcing: { type: 'boolean' }, }, }, }, ], selective: [], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['BD'], budget: budgetFor() }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], ledger: declarationsFor([ 'project.rfq_file', 'project.intake_record', 'project.pn_class', // 受理结论:两枚去向旗落在这里(一单一行,G1/G2 读同一个值) 'project.intake_verdict', 'project.alt_request', 'project.inquiry_request', 'intel.history_price', 'customer.profile', ]), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.rfqIntake, LANDINGS['rfq-intake']!, ASK['rfq-intake']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:受理一单', input: { customerCode: 'C001', rfqRef: 'RFQ-001' }, expect: { ports: ['intake'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), /* ── A2 替代选型(Case · FAE) ──────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('alt-selection', '替代选型', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'alt-selection', // 0.2.0:入参加 rfqRef —— 办结时要回写「受理结论」那一行,主键就是它 version: '0.2.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['material', 'rfqRef'], properties: { material: { type: 'string' }, chip_type: { type: 'string' }, spec_params: { type: 'string' }, scenario: { type: 'string' }, needSourcing: { type: 'boolean' }, /* * 询价单号。声明它是为了**不偷渡**:边上映射一个契约没声明的字段, * 闭合校验的类型检查会因 `targetType === undefined` 直接跳过 —— 不报错, * 但那是默许不是正当,而且下一个读代码的人无从知道 A2 还收这个字段。 */ rfqRef: { type: 'string' }, }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'benchmark', description: '替代对标表(已签字)+ needSourcing 原样带出(G2 在本路径读它)', payload: { type: 'object', required: ['rows', 'needSourcing'], properties: { rows: { type: 'array' }, needSourcing: { type: 'boolean' } }, }, }, ], selective: [], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['FAE'], budget: budgetFor() }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], // 受理结论同在声明里:A2 要把 needSourcing 回写**同一行**,去向只有一个出处 ledger: declarationsFor([ 'intel.chip_spec', 'intel.public_select', 'project.alt_benchmark', 'project.intake_verdict', ]), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.altSelection, LANDINGS['alt-selection']!, ASK['alt-selection']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:一件替代评估', input: { material: 'LM358DR' }, expect: { ports: ['benchmark'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), /* ── A3 寻源询价(Case · PRM) ──────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('sourcing-inquiry', '寻源询价', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'sourcing-inquiry', version: '0.1.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['pn'], properties: { pn: { type: 'string' }, brand: { type: 'string' }, era: { type: 'string' }, project_stage: { type: 'string' }, accept_alt: { type: 'boolean' }, }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'compare', description: '寻源比价表 + 供应商底价表', payload: { type: 'object', required: ['rows', 'floors'], properties: { rows: { type: 'array' }, floors: { type: 'array' } }, }, }, ], selective: [], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }, { name: 'mail.send' }], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['PRM'], budget: budgetFor(), }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }, { name: 'mail.send' }], ledger: declarationsFor([ 'supplier.channel_dir', 'supplier.dead_stock', 'project.sourcing_compare', 'project.supplier_floor', ]), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.sourcingInquiry, LANDINGS['sourcing-inquiry']!, ASK['sourcing-inquiry']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:一单询价', input: { pn: 'LM358DR' }, expect: { ports: ['compare'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), /* ── A4 成本定价(SOP · BD) ────────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('cost-pricing', '成本定价', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'cost-pricing', version: '0.1.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['records'], properties: { records: { type: 'array' }, floors: { type: 'array' }, benchmark: { type: 'array' }, customerCode: { type: 'string' }, }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'draft', description: '报价草案:逐条定价,先过底价门禁再提审', payload: { type: 'object', required: ['rows'], properties: { rows: { type: 'array' }, quote_no: { type: 'string' } }, }, }, ], selective: [], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['BD'], budget: budgetFor() }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }], ledger: declarationsFor(['intel.history_price', 'customer.profile', 'project.quote_draft']), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.costPricing, LANDINGS['cost-pricing']!, ASK['cost-pricing']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:一批草案', input: { records: [] }, expect: { ports: ['draft'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), /* ── A6 报价议价(Case · BD) ───────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('quote-negotiation', '报价议价', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'quote-negotiation', version: '0.2.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['rows'], properties: { rows: { type: 'array' }, quote_no: { type: 'string' }, customerCode: { type: 'string' } }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'formal', description: '正式报价单(已送出)+ 跟进提醒', payload: { type: 'object', properties: { quote_no: { type: 'string' }, customer_code: { type: 'string' }, rows: { type: 'array' }, }, }, }, ], /* * 三个去向是**选择组**,不是必交口里的一个字段:人在放行时恰选一口, * 那一口就是这次运行的 outcome(引擎按选口注入),G4 判的正是它。 * 从前写成 formal 口的必填 outcome + selective: [] —— 引擎只在选择组 * 恰发一口时才注入 outcome,没有选择组就永远没有 outcome,G4 三条边全不成立。 */ selective: [ { group: '议价结果', ports: [ { name: 'won', description: '成交 —— 转订单履约', payload: { type: 'object' } }, { name: 'revise', description: '有异议 —— 退回重新定价', payload: { type: 'object' } }, { name: 'lost', description: '拒绝或超时 —— 归档闭环', payload: { type: 'object' } }, ], }, ], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }, { name: 'mail.send' }], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['BD'], budget: budgetFor(), }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [{ name: 'crm.history-price-read' }, { name: 'mail.send' }], ledger: declarationsFor(['project.formal_quote', 'project.followup']), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.quoteNegotiation, LANDINGS['quote-negotiation']!, ASK['quote-negotiation']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:一单议价', input: { rows: [] }, expect: { ports: ['formal'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), /* ── A7 情报归档(SOP · BD) ────────────────────────────────────── */ activityManifestSchema.parse({ identity: identity('intel-archive', '情报归档', 'flow'), contract: { activityId: 'intel-archive', version: '0.1.0', input: { data: { type: 'object', required: ['outcome'], properties: { outcome: { type: 'string' }, quote_no: { type: 'string' }, customer_code: { type: 'string' }, quotedAt: { type: 'string' }, }, }, messageAllowed: true, }, output: { mandatory: [ { name: 'stats', description: '不成交也留资产:情报、客户画像、落地率', payload: { type: 'object', required: ['landing_rate'], properties: { landing_rate: { type: 'number' } }, }, }, ], selective: [], }, ...contractRest, authorization: authorizationFor(), resources: { tools: [], skills: [], models: [], roles: ['BD'], budget: budgetFor() }, }, declarations: { models: [], listeners: [], harness, tools: [], ledger: declarationsFor(['intel.history_price', 'customer.profile', 'project.landing_stats']), }, assets: { businessModel: placeholderSkeleton(STEPS.intelArchive, LANDINGS['intel-archive']!, ASK['intel-archive']!), skills: [], viewTemplates: [], cardSchemas: {}, distillHooks: [], }, samples: [ { name: '契约样例:一次归档', input: { outcome: 'lost' }, expect: { ports: ['stats'] }, }, ], entry: { file: 'index.js', checksum }, }), ]; export async function installSlots(container: Container): Promise { for (const manifest of MVP_SLOTS) { const { activityId, packageVersion, name, paradigm } = manifest.identity; /* * 先问库里有没有这一版 —— 因为「安装恒为新增、版本并存」:同版再装是 no-op, * manifest 一个字不动。不问就报「已装入」等于**撒谎**:改了槽位内容重播种, * 屏幕说装好了,库里还是旧的,人拿着旧行为查新代码(实测踩到,那次是卡面没换)。 */ const already = await container.registry .manifestOf(activityId, packageVersion) .then(() => true) .catch(() => false); const verdict = await container.registry.install(manifest, SLOT_ARTIFACT); const errors = verdict.staticFindings.filter((finding) => finding.severity === 'error'); process.stdout.write( ` 槽位 ${name}(${paradigm})${already ? ` v${packageVersion} 已在库,未改动 —— 要换内容请升包版` : ` v${packageVersion} 已装`}` + ` · 静态审 ${verdict.staticFindings.length} 条` + (errors.length > 0 ? ` —— ERROR: ${errors.map((e) => e.message).join('; ')}` : '') + '\n', ); } }