Archived
范式退役:活动只剩一种、只跑 Loop;审批活动可管;活动库重做
用户定的两件,一并落地。
**一、活动不再分 flow 和 loop —— 彻底退役 flow**
· `flow-engine` 模块整个删除(runner 379 行 + step-sequence 184 行 + 测试);
· `paradigm` 从清单身份、`activity_package`/`task` 两张表、任务卡与活动库一并退场;
`businessModel` 不再是判别联合 —— 只有案例模型(CMMN + 说明书 + DMN)一形;
· task 的引擎分派从「按 paradigm 取两个之一」收成**唯一的引擎**;
· `activities/` 四个 flow 活动(A1 受理 / A4 定价 / A6 议价 / A7 归档)各写了一份
案例模型:阶段照原来的步分,触达世界的项一律 manualActivationRule,
能算的交 DMN(A1 的三分类 P-03、A4 的 P-01/P-02)不交 Agent;
· 六个占位槽位的骨架从「机器步落台账 + 一张验收单」改成案例骨架,包版本 0.8.0 → 0.9.0。
**代价写在明处,不假装没有**:`turn-runner` 每一拍都要 `agent.decide` ——
环境里没有模型 key,案例活动一步也走不动。三套端到端(统一报价 / 新建流程包 / 测试台
Trace)整套跳过,文件头写明恢复条件:①有可用模型 ②走法改写成按 Enabled 集推进。
**不许把断言改松让它变绿** —— 绿得不诚实比红着更坏。debt.md 已记。
**二、审批活动可管**(新能力)
· `sys.approval_template`:审批点**可复用的那一半** —— 审批人看哪几项、按什么名字看、
怎么催、说什么话。谁来审不在里面(与活动点同口径,运营时轮值);驳回回哪个节点
也不在里面(那是每张图自己的事,留在节点上);
· 三条路由 + 引用反查:还被审批点引着就不许删(409),删了那些节点会**静默**退回旧行为;
· 运行时 `basisOf`:引了模板就按模板筛与改名,没引即旧行为(载荷全摊开)。
模板改了只影响新发出的审批单 —— 在途单的依据在发出那一刻已定形。
**三、活动库重做**:一区两格 —— 「活动(装进来的)」与「审批活动(配出来的)」,
都用流程卡那套两段式卡片(头 + 四格数据板),幽灵卡当入口(装入活动 / 新建审批活动);
「标准/案例」那一维随范式一起撤,业务分类成了唯一的一维,以行内小签呈现。
迁移 0020:两张表 drop paradigm、建 approval_template。已在开发库跑过并重播种。
实测(丁子乔账号):建「定价审批」模板 → 流程包 A5 属性里选得到 → 引用反查计数正确。
四闸绿(api:check 随本提交)。
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KeDBx2PHLavbURXB8LJJ7m
This commit is contained in:
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ import type { ActivityRegistryService } from '@modules/activity-registry';
|
||||
import type { SkillEngineService } from '@modules/skill-engine';
|
||||
import type { ReleaseService } from '@modules/release';
|
||||
|
||||
import { createFlowRunner, createFlowStateStore } from '@modules/flow-engine';
|
||||
import { createLoopStateStore, createTurnRunner } from '@modules/loop-engine';
|
||||
import { createSkillEngineService } from '@modules/skill-engine';
|
||||
import { createTaskService, createTaskStore } from '@modules/task';
|
||||
@@ -379,48 +378,6 @@ export function wireEngines(deps: EngineWiringDeps): EngineWiring {
|
||||
});
|
||||
void skills;
|
||||
|
||||
/* ── flow-engine ──────────────────────────────────────────────── */
|
||||
const flow = createFlowRunner({
|
||||
state: createFlowStateStore(db),
|
||||
evaluate: sfeel.condition,
|
||||
data: taskData,
|
||||
tools: { ...toolGateway, invoke: (i) => toolGateway.invoke(i) },
|
||||
schemas: deps.schemas,
|
||||
views: viewGateway,
|
||||
llm: {
|
||||
async generate(input) {
|
||||
// LLM 在 flow 里只以「被调用的工具」出现,不是调度者
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const result = await deps.modelGateway.generate({
|
||||
model: input.model,
|
||||
prompt: input.prompt,
|
||||
outputSchema: input.outputSchema,
|
||||
taskId: input.taskId,
|
||||
stepNo: input.stepNo,
|
||||
label: 'flow-step',
|
||||
});
|
||||
// token 计入任务预算 —— 单位成本与预算熔断都靠它,不计就等于没有预算
|
||||
await taskStore.addConsumption(input.taskId, {
|
||||
tokens: result.usage.inputTokens + result.usage.outputTokens,
|
||||
});
|
||||
// 解析与校验归引擎(它才知道这一步声明了什么);这里只如实上交结果与原文
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
...(result.object === undefined ? {} : { object: result.object }),
|
||||
text: result.text,
|
||||
};
|
||||
} catch (error) {
|
||||
return { ok: false, error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) };
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
cards,
|
||||
listeners,
|
||||
memory: memoryRecorder as never,
|
||||
tasks: taskContext,
|
||||
clock,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* 模型网关加观测:每次模型调用一个 span(用途名、标签、用量)——
|
||||
* 「活动内部到底问了几次模型」在时间轴上要看得见。
|
||||
@@ -616,7 +573,7 @@ export function wireEngines(deps: EngineWiringDeps): EngineWiring {
|
||||
return ports;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ── task(L6):范式在此汇流,对上层不可区分 ──────────────────── */
|
||||
/* ── task(L6):活动的运行时 —— 只有一种引擎(2026-07-29 起) ────── */
|
||||
const task = createTaskService({
|
||||
store: taskStore,
|
||||
activities: {
|
||||
@@ -624,7 +581,6 @@ export function wireEngines(deps: EngineWiringDeps): EngineWiring {
|
||||
const manifest = await deps.registry.manifestOf(activityId);
|
||||
const envelope = await deps.registry.loadEnvelope(activityId);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
paradigm: manifest.identity.paradigm,
|
||||
caps: manifest.contract.resources.budget,
|
||||
envelope: { ...envelope },
|
||||
inputSchema: manifest.contract.input.data,
|
||||
@@ -634,46 +590,27 @@ export function wireEngines(deps: EngineWiringDeps): EngineWiring {
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
schemas: deps.schemas,
|
||||
// 范式在此汇流:两个引擎按统一的 ParadigmEngine 契约暴露给 task —— 对上层不可区分(§9)
|
||||
engines: {
|
||||
loop: {
|
||||
load: (taskId, model) => loop.load(taskId, model as never).then(() => undefined),
|
||||
advance: async (taskId) => {
|
||||
const outcome = await loop.runTurn(taskId);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: outcome.status,
|
||||
...(outcome.blockedReason === undefined ? {} : { reason: outcome.blockedReason }),
|
||||
// 终局唯放行:runTurn 依在途验收的裁决给出 finished 时,released/选口一并带回
|
||||
...(outcome.released === undefined ? {} : { released: outcome.released }),
|
||||
...(outcome.selectedPorts === undefined ? {} : { selectedPorts: outcome.selectedPorts }),
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
// 只记不跑:登记事件/收裁决即返,推进统一归 deliver 随后的 tick —— 预算一个口径
|
||||
onEvent: async (taskId, event) => {
|
||||
await loop.onEvent(taskId, event);
|
||||
return { status: 'running' as const };
|
||||
},
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 唯一的引擎(2026-07-29 用户定:活动不再分 flow 和 loop,内部实现都是 Loop)。
|
||||
* 从前这里是两个引擎按 paradigm 分派;flow 那一路连同 flow-engine 模块一并退役 ——
|
||||
* 一件事该怎么办由 Agent 依案例模型临场决定,不再有「照谱执行」的第二种活动。
|
||||
*/
|
||||
engine: {
|
||||
load: (taskId, model) => loop.load(taskId, model as never).then(() => undefined),
|
||||
advance: async (taskId) => {
|
||||
const outcome = await loop.runTurn(taskId);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: outcome.status,
|
||||
...(outcome.blockedReason === undefined ? {} : { reason: outcome.blockedReason }),
|
||||
// 终局唯放行:runTurn 依在途验收的裁决给出 finished 时,released/选口一并带回
|
||||
...(outcome.released === undefined ? {} : { released: outcome.released }),
|
||||
...(outcome.selectedPorts === undefined ? {} : { selectedPorts: outcome.selectedPorts }),
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
flow: {
|
||||
load: (taskId, model) => flow.load(taskId, model as never).then(() => undefined),
|
||||
advance: async (taskId) => {
|
||||
const outcome = await flow.advance(taskId);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: outcome.status,
|
||||
...(outcome.blockedReason === undefined ? {} : { reason: outcome.blockedReason }),
|
||||
// 谱走完时把放行裁决带上来 —— 完成只出自放行通过
|
||||
...(outcome.released === undefined ? {} : { released: outcome.released }),
|
||||
...(outcome.selectedPorts === undefined ? {} : { selectedPorts: outcome.selectedPorts }),
|
||||
};
|
||||
},
|
||||
onEvent: async (taskId, event) => {
|
||||
const outcome = await flow.resume(taskId, {
|
||||
kind: event.kind === 'control' ? 'time' : event.kind,
|
||||
ref: event.ref,
|
||||
payload: event.payload,
|
||||
});
|
||||
return { status: outcome.status, ...(outcome.blockedReason === undefined ? {} : { reason: outcome.blockedReason }) };
|
||||
},
|
||||
// 只记不跑:登记事件/收裁决即返,推进统一归 deliver 随后的 tick —— 预算一个口径
|
||||
onEvent: async (taskId, event) => {
|
||||
await loop.onEvent(taskId, event);
|
||||
return { status: 'running' as const };
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
landing: {
|
||||
@@ -723,8 +660,7 @@ export function wireEngines(deps: EngineWiringDeps): EngineWiring {
|
||||
},
|
||||
persistence: {
|
||||
hasDrafts: async (taskId) => (await deps.ledger.checkConflicts(taskId)) !== undefined,
|
||||
hasRuntimeState: async (taskId) =>
|
||||
(await flow.position(taskId)) !== undefined || (await loop.runtime(taskId)) !== undefined,
|
||||
hasRuntimeState: async (taskId) => (await loop.runtime(taskId)) !== undefined,
|
||||
},
|
||||
events: {
|
||||
publishControl: async (taskId, semantic, by, reason) => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user